The Life Insurance Shop

September 8, 2009

Insurance World Banks On Mix And Match

Summary
The variety given by protection insurance menus and the companies who are leaders in this kind of insurance. A case study points out how the customer can gain

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 Protection menus which provide customers the chance to pick ‘n mix life and health insurance cover in an all in policy have existed for over fifteen years. Alas the original versions did not appear to be very desirable to customers although the idea was right. Administrative savings, a single set of paperwork and direct debit were approved of by both the insurer and the consumer. On the other hand the benefits provided by these options were outweighed by the weaknesses.

The range of products given by the main pioneers,  Standard Life, weren’t competitive.  IFAs shopped around major providers to put together protective packages for the consumer, which notably undercut the rates found in protection menus. The industry has now progresses and a flood of new protection options have been presented which have secured the approvalof of most of the mediators.

Zurich Life was the first to introduce a winning formula when it re-launched it’s Self Assurance menu. They were soon followed by Legal and General, Liverpool Victoria Life, Friends Provident, Skandia Life, Scottish Equitable Protect and others are sure to shadow their lead before long.

Three fundamental details are found in the majority of protection menus. Critical illness insurance cover lists a number of stated critical illnesses for which it would settle a lump sum. The cheapest option, term assurance, pays out a lump sum if you pass away within a limited period and nothing from then on. The final one is income protection insurance, which offers a consistent income if illness or long term disability stops you from working. The options may give you redundancy cover, which is generally restricted to one or two years and might also be restricted to the pay out of a mortgage. The main value is the flexibility of the products. For instance various levels of insurance can be organised for independent sections, so should you make a claim on 1 part the others will still continue. No supplementary medical evidence will be necessary prior to major life style events, like having a baby, getting married or moving house. These added benefits are called ‘Guaranteed Insurability Options’.

Different elements of insurance may be included following the close of a short questionnaire and you will still get benefit from the normal insurance policy discounts.

An instance of the benefits derived from a protection menu is illustrated by a newley married couple who decided on Aviva’s Protection Choices menu for mortgage protection. They are paying a combined premium of 31 pounds and 40 pence a month for separate critical illnesses and life policies, which have been written on a joint life basis. At the start they have insurance of £109,500 which reduces as their 22 year mortgage is paid off. Life insurance cover will be paid out if 1 of them departs this life and the insurance policy is terminated, but the survivor will still benefit from critical illness cover Life assurance will be maintained for both of themeven if one of them becomes ill and the policy will pay out on whoever dies first.

If the husband and wife had purchased a standard joint life assurance policy with Co-op Insurance they will only receive a pay out on their 1st claim. While with their Protection Choices policy they are provided with 2 possible pay outs costing only £7.00 more. Even if employees are sometimes offered income protection at work they can also insure their home loan in a similar way. As an extra they may want to take out extra critical illnesscover and life insurance not tied to their mortgage. Standard Life’s protection menu permits them to do this in a straightforward and cost effective way. The new menu based insurance products enable you to save pounds even though you can research around for single policies and only save a couple of pence.

September 1, 2009

Insurers Enhance Protection Insurance

Filed under: Life Insurance — Tags: , , , — admin @ 10:59 am

Summary
In this article we explain  how Financial Protection Insurance may grow to be more popular
with the insurance companies at long last making constructive steps that should hopefully be successful.

Most experienced and qualified  financial advisors would agree that Financial Protection Insurance is necessary  to a good number of families, whether it may be a  precaution in the event of cover for an accident, loss of employment (especially in the present economic climate), prolonged illness or premature death.

Life Insurance policies are the foundation of all financial assurance for cover for a mortgage or to ensure a lump sum that is not taxable, in the eventuality of death.  Unhappily, a proportion of other Financial Protection Insurance types, do not have the same reliable qualities and have been labelled as being miss-sold.  furthermore, based on what we are now aware, critical illness insurance has suffered owing to astonishing exclusions from insurance policies making it feasible for insurers to reject claims even when they are genuine.

However, a little confidence was re established when Standard Life Cover reported on the conclusion of claims on Critical Illness policies on their 1/2 yearly statistics.

Critical Illness Insurance claims were being declined because customers did not disclose their complete medical history.  As a result Norwich Union  says that in the last six months the number of refused claims has fallen considerably from 6.8% in the last year, to 1.6%.

Why?  We believe, not only Standard Life but all of the insurers, because of harmful public relations, have been placed in a situation whereby they must reduce the number of claims that are rejected. Does this show how forceful the press can be?  Debateable perhaps – you may think we are dubious but we think there are other factors that urged the insurers to make adjustments.  Lately, as a result of bad press, sales of Critical Illness Cover  have declined which in turn has obviously impinged on the insurance company’s profit. This is most likely to have been the vehicle to further change!

Axa, Friends Provident, Norwich Union and Scottish Provident have instigated some prominent alterations expressly designed to reduce their rejection rates. To start with, they silhouette plainly that all health disclosure, however trivial a visit to a Doctor might have been, must be revealed.  Scottish Provident, amongst others will get a Doctor or Nurse to phone every candidate to go through all the particulars of their medical history.  If the policy then goes on risk, a number of policyholders are being told that it is important that they provide full medical disclosure and they are allowed to add or correct any information on their application.

The Insurance Company may then reconsider the risk and if it is thought to be increased the monthly premium will likely be increased – which looks more reasonable and eventually more satisfactory than paying the original payment then having a claim rejected owing to non-disclosure of medical records.

This process should have been taken by the insurers years ago as the public’s understanding of Protection Insurance has eroded by their somewhat strange approach. On a positive note, there is a clear and necessary need for protection insurance so we can hope that it is able to restore faith and then the esteem it duly deserves.

Powered by WordPress